RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03525
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) agreement effective date be
changed to 13 Feb 13 instead of 7 Jun 13.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The delayed release date of the annual ARP agreement (7 Jun 13)
voided his only opportunity to apply for the $25,000 yearly bonus.
He would not be penalized approximately $40,000 over the next four
years had the agreement been released at the beginning of FY13 as
in normal years.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a member of the Air National Guard (ANG).
According to Special Order AA-0000216 dated 1 Feb 13, he was
placed on Extended Active Duty (EAD) effective 13 Feb 13 through
12 Feb 17.
The applicants FY13 ARP Agreement Statement of Understanding
(SOU) reflects that on 28 Jun 13 he requested Option A,
$25,000 per year for a 4 year period effective 13 Feb 13 through
12 Feb 17. The request was approved by his commander on 6 Mar 14.
In a letter dated 5 Nov 13, the applicant requested that his case
be kept open while he submitted the corrected documents to
NGB/A1PF for further consideration. On 17 Dec 13, SAF/MRBC advised
the applicant that in order to comply with a statutory mandate to
process all applications in a more expeditious manner, extensions
of time to in which to gather more information could not be
honored. Therefore, his case was administratively closed. He was
informed that his case would be reopened for further processing
and consideration by the Board upon his request.
On 12 May 14, the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) denied relief
to two applicants making similar arguments to the AFBCMR. Her
memorandum stated, in part, that Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP)
is an incentive program, not an entitlement. The intent of
Congress (and therefore the purpose of the statute) was to provide
an incentive that would encourage aviation service officers not to
leave active duty. Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers
an incentive to an officer for a decision he/she has already made
and provides a retention bonus for a period of service already
served. Doing so would depart from the purpose of the statute.
Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in
any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any
delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become
the basis for a retroactive recovery.
On 12 Jul 14, SAF/MRBR forwarded the applicant copies of the noted
SecAF decisions for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit I).
As of this date, this office has not received a response.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PF concluded the applicant is ineligible and should not be
permitted to request, execute, or be paid for a FY13 ARP agreement
as the package presented was incomplete. The documents provided
do not provide a complete picture of his eligibility. In order to
provide a complete package for re-evaluation, documents and/or
corrections are required. Should the applicant decide to provide
the additional documentation listed, A1PF will reassess the case.
A complete copy of the A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In a letter dated 11 Mar 14, the applicant requested his
application be re-opened. He provides the required documentation
to support his request for FY13 ARP, Option A for four years at
$25,000 per year effective 13 Feb 13 to 12 Feb 17.
He provides an NGB/HR exception to policy letter signed by HR and
his wing commander equivalent (ANGRC/CC) supporting his request to
grant Option A of the agreement.
He also provides a contingency ARP agreement supporting Option B
for $15,000 per year effective 21 Jun 13 to 12 Feb 17 should the
Board not find in his favor of his original request.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit F.
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PF recommends approval of the applicants request. Upon
review, A1PF concluded he should be permitted to request, execute
and be paid for the FY13 ARP effective 13 Feb 13 through 12 Feb
17 at $25,000 per year.
According to Special Order AA-0000216 dated 1 Feb 13, he was
ordered to duty from 13 Feb 13 through 12 Feb 17. This period
would have allowed him to enter into an FY13 ARP agreement In
Accordance With (IAW) paragraph 2.1 of the Air National Guard
(ANG) FY13 ARP Policy. The FY13 ARP policy was delayed until
7 Jun 13 resulting in the application submission to be delayed.
This delay prevented him from applying at the beginning of his
eligibility and was through no fault of his own. The applicant
meets all other eligibility requirements.
The complete A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit G.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was provided to the applicant
on 12 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit H).
As of this date, this office has not received a response.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant
approval of the applicants requests for FY13 ARP Option A or B.
We note that NGB/AIPF recommends approval of the applicants
request for FY13 ARP Option A ($25,000 per year for four years)
effective 13 Feb 13 to 12 Feb 17 stating the delay of the FY13 ARP
policy prevented him from applying at the beginning of his
eligibility and was through no fault of his own. We also note the
applicant requested ARP Option B on 11 Mar 14 with an effective
date of 21 Jun 13. However, as noted above, ARP is an incentive
program, not an entitlement. The intent of Congress (and
therefore the purpose of the statute) was to provide an incentive
that would encourage aviation service officers not to leave active
duty. True incentives influence decisions about the future.
Backdating an ARP agreement essentially offers an incentive to an
officer for a decision he has already made and provides a
retention bonus for a period of service already served. Doing so
would depart from the purpose of the statute. Moreover, because
the decision whether or not to offer ARP in any given year is
entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval
of the program for a given year cannot become the basis for a
retroactive recovery. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested
relief.
4. The applicants case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2013-03525 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jun 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, NGB/A1PF, dated 9 Sep 13.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Oct 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Nov 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 17 Dec 13.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Mar 14.
Exhibit G. Memorandum, NGB/A1PF, dated 24 Apr 14.
Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Jul 14.
Exhibit I. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Jul 14, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00475
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00475 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) contract be changed to reflect he is on a four-year Air Guard Reserve (AGR) tour. Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00960
Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers an incentive to an officer for a decision he has already made and provides a retention bonus for a period of service already served. Paragraph 2.2.1 of the ANG FY13 ARP Policy states that members on probationary tours must have orders in hand that cover the entire length of the agreement at the time of their application. The applicant was eligible for a FY13 ARP Agreement that covers the period 7 Jun 13 through 31 Jan 17 at $15,000 per year...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03608
Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any delay in approval of the program for a given year cannot become the basis for a retroactive recovery. The complete SecAF decision is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends denial. Upon further review of the documents provided, A1PF concludes he should be permitted to request,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01030
Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers an incentive to an officer for a decision he has already made and provides a retention bonus for a period of service already served. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00946
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00946 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) eligibility date of 7 Jun 13 be changed to 1 Feb 13 to make him eligible for a four-year Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 ARP Agreement. Furthermore, because the decision whether or not to offer ACP in any given year is entirely at the discretion of the Secretary, any...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03832 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His initial eligibility and start date for Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) be 11 Feb 13. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The delayed release of the Air National Guard (ANG) Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 ARP policy guidance resulted in his not being allowed to renew his two-year ARP agreement. A complete copy of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05602
The intent of Congress (and therefore the purpose of the statute) was to provide an incentive that would encourage aviation service officers not to leave active duty. Upon review of his application, A1PF concluded that he should be permitted to adjust the effective date of his current FY13 ARP agreement from 27 Aug 13 to 2 Feb 13. However, in view of the fact the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) has determined that any delay in the approval of the ARP program for a given year cannot...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01790
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01790 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be approved for the Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13) Air National Guard (ANG) Aviator Retention Pay (ARP) retroactive to 1 Jul 13. Two other members of his unit, who submitted their applications around the same time, were approved for the ARP, because they had more eligibility (Total Active Federal Military Service...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00915
Backdating an ACP agreement essentially offers an incentive to an officer for a decision he has already made and provides a retention bonus for a period of service already served. In accordance with ANGI 36-101, Air National Guard Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program, chapter 6, paragraph 6.1, this order is considered probationary. Paragraph 2.2.1 of the ANG FY 2013 ARP Policy states that members on probationary tours must have orders in hand that cover the entire length of the agreement at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04059
On 11 Jun 12, AFBCMR sent the applicant the SAF/MRB Legal Advisory, dated 9 Apr 13, see Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. The complete NGB/A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was under the impression that ACP was not authorized at the time he signed his contract only due to Congressional...